Product

A working tour of the platform.

Interline is one product with three load-bearing surfaces. The review workspace, where the work happens. The household model, that holds the policies together. The chain of custody, that proves what was done.

What follows is a written walkthrough of each. The mockups below are static compositions of the live screens - no marketing chrome, no rounded browser frames.

I. Review workspace

Where the work actually happens.

A review opens to one screen with three columns. On the left, the ingested artifacts - the carrier illustration, the prior year’s template, the policy file. In the center, the populated brief with modeled scenarios and a draft recommendation. On the right, the queue of items the review still owes a human: a missing fund weighting, an unverified assumption, a draft awaiting partner sign-off.

Nothing is locked behind a wizard. The designer can step out at any point, hand the case to a colleague, and the colleague picks up mid-paragraph. Every cell carries a provenance link to the source.

Reviews / Martinez Family Trust / 2026 Q2Designer · in progress
Artifacts
  • ILLZurich, 2026-04-09.pdfparsed · 14 pages
  • TPL2025 Q2 inforce reviewprior cycle
  • POLPolicy file, master2014 → present
  • IRRCalc lattice22 scenarios
  • EMLCarrier thread, 6 msgslast reply 4d ago
Inforce review · draft

Martinez Family Trust - Zurich PPLI, policy 408-44A

Net IRR · 5y
5.84%
Drag
142 bps
MEC headroom
$1.4M

The fund mix has drifted 4.8 points toward growth equity since the 2023 review. At current premium load, projected internal return holds within the trust’s target band, but a rebalance to the 2024 model portfolio recovers approximately 38 basis points of annual drag.

Recommendation · draft for partner

Rebalance to 2024 model portfolio at next premium event. Maintain current face. Schedule trustee call within 30 days to confirm.

Awaiting you
  • Missing
    Confirm 2026 fund weighting for Vanguard intl pool
  • Stale
    Carrier reply expected 6d ago
  • Ready
    Partner sign-off on draft recommendation
  • Done
    Scenario lattice locked
Inforce review workspace · static composition
Open a real review in the demo workspace
II. Household model

Policies do not live alone.

A single ultra-high-net-worth client is, in practice, a household: an insured, a trust that owns the policy, a trustee with signing authority, the family office that pays the premium, the estate counsel who reads the recommendation. Interline models the relationships explicitly. Reviews coordinate across them.

When the trustee changes, the next review knows. When two policies on the same insured drift toward MEC limits, the household view shows the conflict before the partner does. When the family office requests a face-weighted IRR across four carriers, that is one query.

Clients / Martinez Family / Household4 policies · 3 carriers · est. $48M face
Principals
  • InsuredEduardo Martinez, 64
  • InsuredPatricia Martinez, 61
  • TrustMartinez 2014 Family Trust
  • TrusteeNorthern Trust Bank, NA
  • CounselRosenthal & Co. (Estate)
  • Family officeAurora MFO
Policies in force
CarrierPolicyFaceNet IRR · 5yLast review
Zurich408-44A$22M5.84%2025-Q2
Pacific LifePL-9912$15M6.12%2025-Q3
LombardLOM-1188$8M4.91%2024-Q4
Crown GlobalCG-7741$3M5.03%2025-Q1
Household signal

Lombard policy is 14 months past its last inforce review. Trustee of record updated 2025-08; not yet reflected in the carrier file. Schedule combined review across Zurich + Lombard within 30 days.

Household view · static composition
III. Chain of custody

The audit is an artifact, not a project.

Every action in the workspace writes to an immutable, append-only log: the actor, the timestamp, the input hash, the output hash, the template version, the calculation parameters. The log travels with the policy file. It exports to a printer-ready certificate that looks, reads, and files like a legal document.

When the next reviewer opens the case three quarters from now, they can replay every decision: which illustration parsed, which assumption set was used, which scenario the partner chose, which version of the template was in force. The record is not assembled from screenshots. It is queried.

Chain of custody · Martinez Family Trust · 2026 Q2 reviewv1.0 · sealed 2026-04-15 14:22 UTC
  1. 2026-04-09 09:14 UTC · [email protected]
    Uploaded illustration
    Zurich · 14 pages · sha256 dac4…f81e
  2. 2026-04-09 09:14 UTC · system / parser v3.2
    Parsed illustration → 22 scenarios
    output sha256 9a2c…1b07
  3. 2026-04-11 10:42 UTC · [email protected] (Designer)
    Populated 2026 Q2 inforce template
    template v2026.2 · output sha256 4f81…aa12
  4. 2026-04-11 11:08 UTC · [email protected]
    Adjusted fund weighting (Vanguard intl, +2.4pt)
    prior 31.6 → revised 34.0
  5. 2026-04-12 14:33 UTC · [email protected] (Partner)
    Approved draft recommendation
    signed · sha256 e1f7…22b9
  6. 2026-04-15 14:22 UTC · system / sealer
    Sealed review v1.0
    root sha256 0bbe…3d4a · written to retention
Reviewer of record
Rachel Cohen, Senior Designer
Approving partner
Jordan Lee, Partner
Chain-of-custody record · prints as a legal-grade artifact
What it adds up to

One spine. Every review your firm runs.

The same workspace, household model, and chain of custody handle every case in the firm. The data compounds - new carriers onboarded, formats learned, response times tracked - and the audit trail comes for free.